And if I may head off on a nonsensical aside, I remember the “not gay enough” idea being portrayed hilariously in a Kids in the Hall skit, where they went to see a gay sequel to Grumpy Old Men (hilarious enough in itself) and complained about being ripped off when the female lead spent half the movie topless, but the only action between the guys was a single kiss at the end hidden behind a closing garage door. “Nonsensical” still describes my feelings pretty well, but I am just confused. Or could it be because the “gay” pun only works in English speaking countries, so they’d have no idea that it was at all gay based solely on the translated title? Grandpa and NOT his Son Having a Lesson the Couch. Sexy gay old man with young first time Big jizz-shotgun gay sex 7 min 496k. 18-19 Twinks Asian Bear Best Big Cock Black Interracial Massage Old Man Vintage All categories.
Or if it was the opposite, and the two-guys cover was created to make it an easier sell for gay audiences in other territories, then why is that? Would gay audiences in Europe worry that the movie wasn’t going to be gay enough if they couldn’t see an obviously gay couple on the cover? Watch unlimited Old Man vids for free and in HD quality at Man Porn XXX - the most popular gay sex tube now Categories. Why does Christmas have to be emphasized, and more importantly why does it have to be emphasized here? Is it assumed that American audiences will see a movie about gays as being “gay first” automatically, so there’s a need to fight against that perception? I mean it’s hard not to take “emphasize the Christmas aspect in North America” as implying “downplay the gay aspect in North America” due to North American sensibilities. Forget which is more effective, I want to know which came first and why one was chosen for the other. Responses to this QOTD sent by email will be ignored please post your responses here.) Categories dvd/vod/streaming, talk amongst yourselves Tags Make the Yuletide Gay, questions (If you have a suggestion for a QOTD, feel free to email me.
What’s up with this apparently but nonsensically homophobic DVD cover? But I can’t figure out what other explanation there could be. Now, actually, I don’t think the homophobia explanation makes sense: This title was never going to be showing up on the shelves of Wal-Mart where it might scare the locals, and it should in fact be designed to appeal to gays and gay-friendlies on sites like Amazon, where the DVD cover is the first thing you notice. (The movie is about a gay couple masquerading as straight friends during a Christmas with the parents of one of them.) I didn’t find anything offputting about the gingerbread-man cover until I saw the other one, and then I wondered whether there wasn’t a bit of homophobia at work, as if someone feared to offer up two men in a romantic pose.
On the right is the Region 1 DVD cover art for the same film. On the left is the Region 2 DVD cover art for Make the Yuletide Gay. Is it me, or is there something a little hinky in the difference between these two DVD covers for the same movie?